 |
| Ron (Rupert Grint), Hermione (Emma Watson) and Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) Image: El Universal |
A long time
that the film directors and screenwriters are used to working directly
adaptations of literary works. One of the best known and most striking was
undoubtedly Harry Potter. And I must confess that this is my favorite saga, never any
story had captivated me as much as the one that happens in the world of
witchcraft, located in Hogwarts.
Having gone through all my childhood and
pre-adolescence, since the Philosopher's Stone until the last Deathly Hallows,
Harry Potter behaved itself many of the dreams and desires of young people,
including me, makes us believe in the existence of a supernatural world where ,
through the magic, we can do unthinkable things for any human being like fly,
levitate, open doors, transform us in others, another useful like how to repair and fix
objects, but also dangerous as to blow up something that bothers or attack us,
kill or torture someone.
I have read the books and saw the movies and, in my opinion, these more visual aspects are always more
appealing to the movies, because it brings a lot of audience and success.
However, what abounds in special effects, fails in creativity and narrative
writing. The JK Rowling's books are more expressive, address the different
trajectories of the characters, in a more complete and real way, awaken feelings and conections with the story which movies doesn`t pass, at least in a so notorious way and, ultimately, they tell us about everything, are detailed and doesn`t leave anything to say, unlike the films, which
due to the limits of duration, are forced to stay by the sample or at half the
potential of this tale, which for more years that pass, will always remain in my
memory.
This was my first and primary experience of literature applied to other
medium which already had. The books worth much more than any film. And
Harry Potter is not an exception.
Video: Youtube
David Magalhães.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario